![]() Importantly you will have several goals that reinforce change across the child’s phonology. Notice that the rubric ensures that you will have a range of treatment goals that covers different levels of the phonological hierarchy and a spectrum of complexity. You will need another set for your second “block” of treatment sessions in any case. This choice would impact the choices in the stabilize and expand categorize. The work on velar consonants in the onset will permit focus on the voice/voiceless contrast as well.Ī completely different set could have been chosen to centre on the gliding of nasals in the onset given the cost to intelligibility. This is especially true if the voiceless stops are produced with proper aspiration. The voiceless stops in the onset and the /s/-clusters in the coda might might support the appearance of fricatives and /s/-clusters in the onset. These recommended goals are not necessarily the “best” ones but they are designed to be complementary. Stabilize production of voiceless stops in the onset position.Įxtend production of velar stops from coda to onset.Įxpand the system to include /s/ clusters, starting with the coda position. Here is my suggestion (but you can disagree with me in the comments!) STABILIZE If I remember my statistics classes from over 30 years ago correctly, random selections would yield over (3!)x(3!)x(3!)=216 possible answers and they would all be fine but maybe we can be a bit more systematic than that. Select one goal from each column, that is, variable pattern, context specific pattern, and consistent pattern. Here phonological patterns are described using familiar terminology for the most part: VARIABLE Identify patterns belonging to the three major types. Notice that CV, CVC, CVCV, and CVCVC word shapes are present along with glides, stops, nasals, and fricatives. A speech sample constructed for a hypothetical three-year-old children with moderate expressive language delay and mild receptive language delay. That is target 3 all at the same time for a block of predictable length (e.g., six or twelve weeks) then switch to three new targets, again chosen across the three types of goals. My preference is for horizontal with a cycles component.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |